Friday, August 31, 2012

Pinterest-Obsessed Retailers Are Missing The ... - Business Insider

socialcommercesumchilogo_edited-1.jpgLearn the latest strategy in e-commerce and social media at Social Commerce Summit on February 6, 2013, in New York. Speakers include hot startups and major brands. Reserve your ticket now.

InSparq

Here's why Zappos should be making more money from Pinterest.

?

New York e-commerce entrepreneur Richie Hecker thinks retailers are doing social all wrong.

His company, InSparq, makes technology for social commerce, and Hecker tells us they're seeing better results than Zappos, which recently reported that a share on Pinterest only generates 75 cents in new sales on average.

InSparq's customers see 92 cents per share on average, but that gets a lot better depending on the category?$1.40 for cosmetics retailers, and $5.09 for clothing.

Zappos, an online shoes and clothing retailer owned by Amazon.com, could be doing things better, according to Hecker. Its Pinterest-sharing tool, for example, just posts an image and a product name. Including some "suggestive copy," Hecker says?for example, "Here's my latest find on Zappos: [product name]"?could boost its results.

But Hecker has a much simpler suggestion: email. An email share generates $5.90 on average across InSparq's network.

Groupon, One Kings Lane, and a ton of other retailers have found that email's an effective marketing channel. It's just not as sexy as Facebook or Twitter.?(To its credit, Zappos does include email as a sharing option.)

Read the full post at inSparq?>

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/insparq-pinterest-study-2012-8

lenny dykstra the voice jenelle evans jenelle evans mlb 12 the show sabu google play

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Half of Americans Die With Almost No Money - Structured ...

Home ? All, Headlines

Retireee contemplates financial readinessPrior to 2009, many injured plaintiffs were most concerned with investing their settlement proceeds in the stock and real estate markets. Since 2009, I have seen a shift in focus. The largest concern by injured plaintiffs today is outliving their money. There is good cause for worry.

A recent article posted on MarketWatch cites a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research showing that 46% of American retirees have just $10,000 when they die. While people can live with limited savings, the study?s findings are a reminder of how fragile our economic conditions are if a financial emergency occurs. A structured settlement that prepares for unforeseen medical and other uncertainties during retirement means injured parties can enjoy financial peace of mind when it matters most.

For the full article, visit Yahoo Finance (http://finance NULL.yahoo NULL.com/news/half-americans-die-almost-no-040133462 NULL.html?l=1).
National Bureau of Economic Research Study: Here (http://www NULL.nber NULL.org/papers/w17824 NULL.pdf?new_window=1)

No related posts.

Source: http://patrickfarber.com/pat-farber-headlines/half-of-americans-die-with-almost-no-money/

joe oliver joba chamberlain new york mega millions jetblue jetblue michelle malkin october baby

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

10 Things I like About Change Management | Horizontal Change ...

I keep getting asked, usually after explaining some difficulty around change, why I like this career.

Here are ten reasons in no particular order:

  1. People.

    Change needs people. Change needs people?s talent and expertise. To change requires the effort of both individuals and individuals coming together. People can stick together like glue for some things. People can repel each other and good ideas to about the same degree. It is challenging and fascinating to try to figure people out and find that stickiness.

  2. Business.

    Change for business can take on many flavors- M & A, technology adoption, organizational redesign, cultural tweaking, new leadership, structural redo?s and more. Business is influenced by so many things both internal and external. Anticipating them and ?managing them? is 50% of the change equation. This flavorful combination, tasted over a career, keeps me coming back for more.

  3. Potential.

    There is so much more possibility in organizations on both the people and the business side. One engagement is often the chance to reveal potential for the next. Change practitioners get to assess the past, enjoy the process of the present and plan for the future.

  4. The Journey.

    Admittedly the journey is often the most difficult part of change. Difficulty equals challenge. This is a challenging career.

  5. Beginnings.

    This is number one, really. Beginnings have so much possibility. Change should be all about possibility.

  6. Simple Tasks.

    Sometimes organizational change is so big, broad and all encompassing that the simple tasks on the way to the end state become the most enjoyable part of the role of a change practitioner.

  7. Learning.

    Seems to happen every day of a change engagement. It might be the real learning of figuring out a technology in order to better guide leadership to end state descriptions. Other days it is the learning the comes with watching and guiding individuals and the group to new skill and profit.

  8. Time.

    Different practitioners are drawn to change management for different reasons. Some want a better connection to people (there are a lot of former engineers- previously immersed in the role of an individual contributor- now practicing CM). Some like to organize and attempt to control things (and possibly people), those practitioners do well in the middle of the organization on projects doing Tactical Change. For me it is a fascination with time. Changes tweak time for organizations. As an external I get to see and address time.

  9. Celebration.

    This part gets skipped a lot in the turmoil of change. When the end state is reached that is an obvious time for celebration. Along the way for important milestones too. Little celebrations are typically forgotten- bring in a change practitioner to make sure celebration is not missed (and happens more than once).

  10. End States.

    If you get there, and, of course, you never really do. The closer you get though, the better our previous 9 become (the next time around!).

Ten things I like about this career, to answer those who keep asking: people, business, potential, the journey, beginnings, simple tasks, learning, time celebration and getting to end states.

Technorati Tags: change management, change management blogs

Source: http://horizontalchange.com/2012/08/10-things-i-like-about-change-management/

ndamukong suh ndamukong suh aptera aptera national defense authorization act national defense authorization act seven days in utopia

Monday, August 27, 2012

Marketing Truths - Direct Business Marketing

Hello and welcome, my name is Andrew Houglum with Direct Business Marketing. Today we?re going to talk about a marketing truth known as ?Building a Better Bridge?. First I wanted to talk about marketing truths and what they are. At our business we?ve found that no matter what you?re marketing, if you follow these truths when you?re developing a campaign and messaging out to your potential clients your results will be much better. As we go through all of these, definitely wash them all and it will help you.

The first one we?re going to talk about is ?Build a Better Bridge?. What do we mean by this? This is a marketing truth that holds true from print marketing all the way to online marketing. The first thing in building a better bridge is what are your prospective clients searching on online marketing or looking for offline marketing. The next question is, ?What are you selling?? Really identifying your business is important and this is where a lot of businesses make their mistakes because they feel that they?re selling something that they?re not. This marketing truth is basically reminding you to make sure you recognize what your prospects are looking for, what you?re selling and make sure there?s a bridge between the two. Ensure that you can deliver what the prospect is looking for and bridge them over to what you?re selling so they can make the connection between the two.

In closing, figure out what you?re selling, figure out what they?re looking for, build that bridge and all of your marketing materials will perform better. Again, my name is Andrew Houglum; my contact information can be found on the last slide. I?d also like to remind you to join us every Wednesday at 10am PST for more of these live webinars. Thanks for watching.

Source: http://directbusinessmarketing.com/marketing-truths-building-a-better-bridge-for-your-clients/

breaking bad food network star jeremy lin Sage Stallone Michael Clarke Duncan Mermaid Body Found Celeste Holm

Obese and overweight women face increased risk of recurrence of most common type of breast cancer

ScienceDaily (Aug. 27, 2012) ? Extra pounds -- even within the overweight but not obese range -- are linked to a higher risk of recurrence of the most common type of breast cancer despite optimal cancer treatment, according to a new study published early online in Cancer, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society. The study's results suggest that extra body fat causes hormonal changes and inflammation that may drive some cases of breast cancer to spread and recur despite treatment.

Women who are obese when they are diagnosed with breast cancer have an increased risk of dying prematurely compared with women of normal weight. In this new study, Joseph Sparano, MD, of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine's Montefiore Medical Center, in Bronx, NY, and his colleagues across the US cancer cooperative groups compared the health outcomes of obese and overweight patients with others in a large group of women with stage I-III breast cancer who had participated in three National Cancer Institute-sponsored treatment trials led by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (now part of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group). All of the trials (E1199, E5188, and E3189) required participants to have normal heart, kidney, liver, and bone marrow function, thereby excluding patients with other significant health issues. As a result, researchers were able to disentangle the influence of obesity from other factors affecting cancer recurrence and survival.

The researchers found that increasing body mass index -- a measure of the body's fat content -- significantly increased women's risk of cancer recurrence and death, despite optimal treatment including chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. There was a stepwise relationship between increasing body mass index and poor outcomes only in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, the most common type of breast cancer that accounts for approximately two-thirds of all breast cancer cases in the United States and worldwide.

"We found that obesity at diagnosis of breast cancer is associated with about a 30 percent higher risk of recurrence and a nearly 50 percent higher risk of dea

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Wiley, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/~3/wuP4umU1XI4/120827074841.htm

pebble beach golf beverly hilton roland martin whitney houston dead at 48 whitney houston dead 2012 whitney houston passed away heartbreak hotel

Questions About Home Improvement? Find The Answers Here ...

If you want to do a simple home improvement that will add value to your bathrooms, consider stripping off the old wallpaper. Wallpaper is a dated wall covering and many times when a new home buyer sees it, it is a turn off. Strip it off and paint a neutral color.

Listen to a contractor when you discuss your home improvement project and pay attention to what he says. If he gently lets you know an idea is folly, or asks you questions to get a better understanding of your needs, then he?s probably a great contractor. Also, see if he?s listening to you or if he?s just trying to get you to do what he envisions.

Educate yourself before starting any home improvement projects. Be sure to research building codes and the history of the structure before you tear anything apart. Many projects are left uncompleted due to a lack of understanding of how something goes back together after it has been taken apart.

If you have an unfinished basement or attic then that will be the best place to put your home improvement money. The added living space can be included on the square footage of your house, and you will enjoy being able to use it as another room. Create a playroom for your kids, or a man cave for the gentleman of the house.

Choose wallpaper patterns carefully. Avoid using overpowering patterns in small spaces; conversely, using a bold design in a very large room will make it appear cozier. Never use a patterned wallpaper if you have patterned carpet or window coverings. For a room full of awkward corners and recesses, pick a wallpaper with a random design that the eye doesn?t tend to follow. This will help to disguise any imperfections in the walls.

When you are painting your home do not forget to put a coat of primer before you put the coat or coats of paint that you intend to put. Putting primer on the area first will create a solid bond and it will help the paint adhere to the surface.

For those who like to do it themselves instead of hiring someone, there are many ways to learn different techniques for home improvement. Looking on the internet, reading books or talking to more knowledgeable individuals, can help you to glean some useful information. There is much that can be learned for someone who wants to fix up a house.

When planning home improvements so that you can rent an area of your house out, make sure that space will adequately house a human being. If there?s absolutely no kitchen space and only a bed can fit in the sleeping area you will get far less rent and quite likely never find a renter.

When you are looking to lower your utility bills, an easy way to improve your home and save money is to check your home for leaky faucets and pipes. This way you can prevent the waste of water just dripping down your sinks and lower your costs over the span of the year.

Interior paint finishes come in a number of textures. For ordinary homeowners there is no reason to select a texture rougher than ?eggshell? or ?orange peel.? In years gone by much rougher textures (like ?popcorn?) were used for walls and ceilings in order to provide visual interest and dampen sound. These textures proved easy to damage and hard to clean, and so fell out of common use.

Consider installing eavestrough covers to keep leaves and other guck out of your water drainage system, preventing damage and flooding. A great product approved by Mike Holmes is Smart Screen Gutter Protection, which fits over existing eavestroughs so you don?t have to pay to have your entire drainage system replaced.

Always comparison shop for contractors when you need to fix up your home. Later, if you decide to sell your house, it is almost certain you will need to have some repair work done. If the work you require is extensive enough, you will have to hire a contractor. This is not something to do on the spur of the moment. Not all contractors are created equal; shop around before engaging one!

When installing a wood stove in your home as a source of heat in the winter months, always choose a stove that is rated for the size and location of the room where it will be placed. Many local building codes require this to be done and professional installers will almost always insist on it.

For home improvement projects big enough to require a contractor, it is very important that you get a contractor you can trust. Review a prospective contractor?s history and talk to his previous employers. Any disputes, lawsuits or cost overruns you find in a contractor?s background are serious warning flags. Remember to ask the contractor to explain anything troubling you turn up, though.

If there?s something you don?t like about your house, don?t just learn to live with it! Take action! Many home improvement projects can be done with minimal work and cost, and now that you?ve read this article, you?ll be able to pull them off yourself. Decide what needs fixing, and get to work.

Dee Huewe has got a web page on the subject of Roofing Companies Jacksonville

Source: http://lmaureen.com/questions-about-home-improvement-find-the-answers-here/

idaho potato bowl cagayan de oro cagayan de oro bowl schedule 2011 bowl schedule barry bonds hazing

Multiple new mini iPad proofs - ProductReviews

The chances of Apple releasing a smaller iPad were very slim when Steve Jobs had been alive, which is thanks to his repeated words on a 7-inch model not being needed to fill the gap between iPhone and the 10-inch iPad. It seems that 2012 is a very different year, and this week alone has seen multiple new mini iPad rumors surfacing that confirm what should be the official name and an event planned for October.

Just two days ago we reported that it would be unlikely to see the new iPhone share a stage with other hardware, which has since been given weight from other sources all pointing towards an October event planned for the iPad mini, and this is separate to the new iPhone event expected in September. Within the last 24-hours an article on AllThingsD has touched on the possibility of an October event for the mini iPad, and it?s their opinion that two events is ideal for Apple to keep on top of the ?tech news cycle? right before the busy holiday shopping season.

The name will be kept simple ? just like Apple did with the ?New iPad?, the 3rd generation, it looks like they will keep the name simple for a smaller iPad this year. Today we?re hearing from an Asian source that the official name will simply be ?iPad mini? and come in at a size of 7.85-inches. The source also highlights that the October event could feature a new iPod touch 5G and iPad nano, and we?ve heard previously this event could be focused on everything iTunes and Music with a more mobile iPad.

What specs would you like the mini iPad to feature? The price is currently unclear, although expect it to be cheaper and lose a few specs to cut costs. The iPod touch 5G might feature NFC, as with the iPad 3, and this would allow for the media player to become almost the same as the iPhone (just lacking traditional phone calls).

Source: http://www.product-reviews.net/2012/08/26/multiple-new-mini-ipad-proofs/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=multiple-new-mini-ipad-proofs

george clooney arrested ravi leigh espn greg oden st patricks day st. bonaventure

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Neil Armstrong, 1st man on the moon, dies at 82

This July 20, 1969 file photo provided by NASA shows Neil Armstrong. The family of Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, says he has died at age 82. A statement from the family says he died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures. It doesn't say where he died. Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969. He radioed back to Earth the historic news of "one giant leap for mankind." Armstrong and fellow astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the moon, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs. In all, 12 Americans walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972. (AP Photo/NASA)

This July 20, 1969 file photo provided by NASA shows Neil Armstrong. The family of Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, says he has died at age 82. A statement from the family says he died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures. It doesn't say where he died. Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969. He radioed back to Earth the historic news of "one giant leap for mankind." Armstrong and fellow astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the moon, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs. In all, 12 Americans walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972. (AP Photo/NASA)

FILE - In undated photo provided by NASA shows Neil Armstrong. The family of Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, says he has died at age 82. A statement from the family says he died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures. It doesn't say where he died. Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969. He radioed back to Earth the historic news of "one giant leap for mankind." Armstrong and fellow astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the moon, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs. In all, 12 Americans walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972. (AP Photo/NASA)

FILE - In this 1969 photo provided by NASA the crew of the Apollo 11 mission is seen. From left are Neil Armstrong, Mission Commander, Michael Collins, Lt. Col. USAF, and Edwin Eugene Aldrin, also known as Buzz Aldrin, USAF Lunar Module pilot. The family of Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, says he has died at age 82. A statement from the family says he died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures. It doesn't say where he died. Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969. He radioed back to Earth the historic news of "one giant leap for mankind." Armstrong and fellow astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the moon, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs. In all, 12 Americans walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972. (AP Photo/NASA)

FILE - In this Sept. 17, 1962 file photo, Neil Armstrong, one of the nine astronauts, is shown as he was introduced to the press, along with the other astronauts in Houston. The family of Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, says he has died at age 82. A statement from the family says he died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures. It doesn't say where he died. Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969. He radioed back to Earth the historic news of "one giant leap for mankind." Armstrong and fellow astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the moon, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs. In all, 12 Americans walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972. (AP Photo/FILE)

FILE - In this March 9, 1966 file photo, Astronaut Neil Armstrong is seated during a suiting up exercise Cape Kennedy, Florida, in preparation for the Gemini 8 flight. The family of Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, says he has died at age 82. A statement from the family says he died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures. It doesn't say where he died. Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969. He radioed back to Earth the historic news of "one giant leap for mankind." Armstrong and fellow astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the moon, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs. In all, 12 Americans walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972. (AP Photo/FILE)

(AP) ? Neil Armstrong was a soft-spoken engineer who became a global hero when as a steely-nerved pilot he made "one giant leap for mankind" with a small step onto the moon. The modest man, who had people on Earth entranced and awed from almost a quarter-million miles away, but credited others for the feat, died Saturday. He was 82.

Armstrong died following complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures, his family said in a statement. It didn't say where he died; he had lived in suburban Cincinnati.

Armstrong commanded the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed on the moon July 20, 1969, capping the most daring of the 20th century's scientific expeditions. His first words after becoming the first person to set foot on the surface are etched in history books and the memories of those who heard them in a live broadcast.

"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," Armstrong said.

(Armstrong insisted later that he had said "a'' before man, but said he too couldn't hear it in the version that went to the world.)

In those first few moments on the moon, during the climax of a heated space race with the then-Soviet Union, Armstrong stopped in what he called "a tender moment" and left a patch to commemorate NASA astronauts and Soviet cosmonauts who had died in action.

"It was special and memorable but it was only instantaneous because there was work to do," Armstrong told an Australian television interviewer this year.

Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin spent nearly three hours walking on the lunar surface, collecting samples, conducting experiments and taking photographs.

"The sights were simply magnificent, beyond any visual experience that I had ever been exposed to," Armstrong once said.

The moonwalk marked America's victory in the Cold War space race that began Oct. 4, 1957, with the launch of the Soviet Union's Sputnik 1, a 184-pound satellite that sent shock waves around the world.

Although he had been a Navy fighter pilot, a test pilot for NASA's forerunner and an astronaut, Armstrong never allowed himself to be caught up in the celebrity and glamour of the space program.

"I am, and ever will be, a white socks, pocket protector, nerdy engineer," he said in February 2000 in one of his rare public appearances. "And I take a substantial amount of pride in the accomplishments of my profession."

A man who kept away from cameras, Armstrong went public in 2010 with his concerns about President Barack Obama's space policy that shifted attention away from a return to the moon and emphasized private companies developing spaceships. He testified before Congress and in an email to The Associated Press, Armstrong said he had "substantial reservations," and along with more than two dozen Apollo-era veterans, he signed a letter calling the plan a "misguided proposal that forces NASA out of human space operations for the foreseeable future."

NASA chief Charles Bolden recalled Armstrong's grace and humility in a statement Saturday.

"As long as there are history books, Neil Armstrong will be included in them, remembered for taking humankind's first small step on a world beyond our own," Bolden said.

Armstrong's modesty and self-effacing manner never faded.

When he appeared in Dayton in 2003 to help celebrate the 100th anniversary of powered flight, he bounded onto a stage before 10,000 people packed into a baseball stadium. But he spoke for only a few seconds, did not mention the moon, and quickly ducked out of the spotlight.

He later joined former astronaut and Sen. John Glenn to lay wreaths on the graves of Wilbur and Orville Wright. Glenn introduced Armstrong and noted it was 34 years to the day that Armstrong had walked on the moon.

"Thank you, John. Thirty-four years?" Armstrong quipped, as if he hadn't given it a thought.

At another joint appearance, the two embraced and Glenn commented: "To this day, he's the one person on Earth, I'm truly, truly envious of."

Armstrong's moonwalk capped a series of accomplishments that included piloting the X-15 rocket plane and making the first space docking during the Gemini 8 mission, which included a successful emergency splashdown.

In the years afterward, Armstrong retreated to the quiet of the classroom and his southwest Ohio farm. Aldrin said in his book "Men from Earth" that Armstrong was one of the quietest, most private men he had ever met.

In the Australian interview, Armstrong acknowledged that "now and then I miss the excitement about being in the cockpit of an airplane and doing new things."

At the time of the flight's 40th anniversary, Armstrong again was low-key, telling a gathering that the space race was "the ultimate peaceful competition: USA versus U.S.S.R. It did allow both sides to take the high road with the objectives of science and learning and exploration."

Glenn, who went through jungle training in Panama with Armstrong as part of the astronaut program, described him as "exceptionally brilliant" with technical matters but "rather retiring, doesn't like to be thrust into the limelight much."

Derek Elliott, curator of the Smithsonian Institution's U.S. Air and Space Museum from 1982 to 1992, said the moonwalk probably marked the high point of space exploration.

The manned lunar landing was a boon to the prestige of the United States, which had been locked in a space race with the former Soviet Union, and re-established U.S. pre-eminence in science and technology, Elliott said.

"The fact that we were able to see it and be a part of it means that we are in our own way witnesses to history," he said.

The 1969 landing met an audacious deadline that President Kennedy had set in May 1961, shortly after Alan Shepard became the first American in space with a 15-minute suborbital flight. (Soviet cosmonaut Yuri A. Gagarin had orbited the Earth and beaten the U.S. into space the previous month.)

"I believe this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before the decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to Earth," Kennedy had said. "No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important to the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish."

The end-of-decade goal was met with more than five months to spare. "Houston: Tranquility Base here," Armstrong radioed after the spacecraft settled onto the moon. "The Eagle has landed."

"Roger, Tranquility," Apollo astronaut Charles Duke radioed back from Mission Control. "We copy you on the ground. You've got a bunch of guys about to turn blue. We're breathing again. Thanks a lot."

The third astronaut on the mission, Michael Collins, circled the moon in the mother ship Columbia 60 miles overhead while Armstrong and Aldrin went to the moon's surface.

Collins told NASA on Saturday that he will miss Armstrong terribly, spokesman Bob Jacobs tweeted.

In all, 12 American astronauts walked on the moon between 1969 and the last moon mission in 1972.

For Americans, reaching the moon provided uplift and respite from the Vietnam War, from strife in the Middle East, from the startling news just a few days earlier that a young woman had drowned in a car driven off a wooden bridge on Chappaquiddick Island by Sen. Edward Kennedy. The landing occurred as organizers were gearing up for Woodstock, the legendary three-day rock festival on a farm in the Catskills of New York.

Armstrong was born Aug. 5, 1930, on a farm near Wapakoneta in western Ohio. He took his first airplane ride at age 6 and developed a fascination with aviation that prompted him to build model airplanes and conduct experiments in a homemade wind tunnel.

As a boy, he worked at a pharmacy and took flying lessons. He was licensed to fly at 16, before he got his driver's license.

Armstrong enrolled in Purdue University to study aeronautical engineering but was called to duty with the U.S. Navy in 1949 and flew 78 combat missions in Korea.

After the war, Armstrong finished his degree from Purdue and later earned a master's degree in aerospace engineering from the University of Southern California. He became a test pilot with what evolved into the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, flying more than 200 kinds of aircraft from gliders to jets.

Armstrong was accepted into NASA's second astronaut class in 1962 ? the first, including Glenn, was chosen in 1959 ? and commanded the Gemini 8 mission in 1966. After the first space docking, he brought the capsule back in an emergency landing in the Pacific Ocean when a wildly firing thruster kicked it out of orbit.

Armstrong was backup commander for the historic Apollo 8 mission at Christmastime in 1968. In that flight, Commander Frank Borman, and Jim Lovell and Bill Anders circled the moon 10 times, and paving the way for the lunar landing seven months later.

Aldrin said he and Armstrong were not prone to free exchanges of sentiment.

"But there was that moment on the moon, a brief moment, in which we sort of looked at each other and slapped each other on the shoulder ... and said, 'We made it. Good show,' or something like that," Aldrin said.

An estimated 600 million people ? a fifth of the world's population ? watched and listened to the landing, the largest audience for any single event in history.

Parents huddled with their children in front of the family television, mesmerized by what they were witnessing. Farmers abandoned their nightly milking duties, and motorists pulled off the highway and checked into motels just to see the moonwalk.

Television-less campers in California ran to their cars to catch the word on the radio. Boy Scouts at a camp in Michigan watched on a generator-powered television supplied by a parent.

Afterward, people walked out of their homes and gazed at the moon, in awe of what they had just seen. Others peeked through telescopes in hopes of spotting the astronauts.

In Wapakoneta, media and souvenir frenzy was swirling around the home of Armstrong's parents.

"You couldn't see the house for the news media," recalled John Zwez, former manager of the Neil Armstrong Air and Space Museum. "People were pulling grass out of their front yard."

Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins were given ticker tape parades in New York, Chicago and Los Angeles and later made a 22-nation world tour. A homecoming in Wapakoneta drew 50,000 people to the city of 9,000.

In 1970, Armstrong was appointed deputy associate administrator for aeronautics at NASA but left the following year to teach aerospace engineering at the University of Cincinnati.

He remained there until 1979 and during that time bought a 310-acre farm near Lebanon, where he raised cattle and corn. He stayed out of public view, accepting few requests for interviews or speeches.

"He didn't give interviews, but he wasn't a strange person or hard to talk to," said Ron Huston, a colleague at the University of Cincinnati. "He just didn't like being a novelty."

Those who knew him said he enjoyed golfing with friends, was active in the local YMCA and frequently ate lunch at the same restaurant in Lebanon.

In 2000, when he agreed to announce the top 20 engineering achievements of the 20th century as voted by the National Academy of Engineering, Armstrong said there was one disappointment relating to his moonwalk.

"I can honestly say ? and it's a big surprise to me ? that I have never had a dream about being on the moon," he said.

From 1982 to 1992, Armstrong was chairman of Charlottesville, Va.-based Computing Technologies for Aviation Inc., a company that supplies computer information management systems for business aircraft.

He then became chairman of AIL Systems Inc., an electronic systems company in Deer Park, N.Y.

Armstrong married Carol Knight in 1999, and the couple lived in Indian Hill, a Cincinnati suburb. He had two adult sons from a previous marriage.

It's the second death in a month of one of NASA's most visible, history-making astronauts. Sally Ride, the first American woman in space, died of pancreatic cancer on July 23 at age 61.

One of NASA's closest astronaut friends was fellow Ohioan, Mercury astronaut John Glenn, the first American to orbit the Earth.

Just prior to the 50th anniversary of Glenn's orbital flight this past February, Armstrong offered high praise to the elder astronaut and said that Glenn had told him many times how he wished he, too, had flown to the moon on Apollo 11. Glenn said it was his only regret.

Noted Armstrong in an email: "I am hoping I will be 'in his shoes' and have as much success in longevity as he has demonstrated." Glenn is 91.

At the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles on Saturday, visitors held a minute of silence for Armstrong. His family's statement made a simple request for anyone else who wanted to remember him:

"Honor his example of service, accomplishment and modesty, and the next time you walk outside on a clear night and see the moon smiling down at you, think of Neil Armstrong and give him a wink."

___

Borenstein reported from Washington. AP Science Writer Alicia Chang in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-08-25-Obit-Neil%20Armstrong/id-f07548936c2c47cab2131757432c0cd7

jet crash virginia beach petrino clayton kershaw fab melo tyler perry face transplant maundy thursday

Timeline: Tim Cook?s First Year As Apple CEO [One Year Of Tim]

Timeline: Tim Cook?s First Year As Apple CEO [One Year Of Tim]

It?s been a rocking year for Tim Cook, his first as Apple?s CEO. Not only didn?t he fuck up, Apple shipped a bunch of hit products and became the biggest company ever.

He also defused a big crisis in Apple?s Chinese supply chain and has made Apple a little more open and relaxed (just a teeny bit).

Hit the jump for a great timeline of what Apple?s been up to under Tim Cook?s tenure. (Really, it?s a fascinating timeline and was a ton of work).

Leander KahneyLeander Kahney is the editor and publisher of Cult of Mac, and author of three books about technology culture: Inside Steve?s Brain, the New York Times bestseller about Steve Jobs; Cult of Mac; and Cult of iPod. Leander has written for Wired, MacWeek, Scientific American, and The Guardian in London. Follow Leander on Twitter @lkahney and Facebook.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by Leander Kahney.

Posted in News, Top stories | Tagged: Apple, ceo, one year of tim, Tim Cook, timeline |


scribol

Source: http://www.cultofmac.com/186634/timeline-tim-cooks-first-year-as-apple-ceo-one-year-of-tim/

ll cool j ufc Avril Lavigne Sam Claflin Tony Farmer West Nile virus symptoms Tropical Storm Isaac

Saturday, August 25, 2012

My Single Adoption: Too excited to sleep!!!

I don't know how I'm supposed to sleep tonight. I feel like a kid on Christmas Eve. Only this is even better. I just have to blog in this moment. I am so excited. I just got home from my friends baby shower and checked my mail to find a letter notifying me that I am going to receive a rather large adoption grant. With the addition of this grant and all the money raised in the last 2 weeks, I think I'm pretty much fully funded (or very close to it). Whoa!!! This is huge!!!! Of course, I won't know the exact amount needed until I know when I'm going to get him and how much the flights are. But I do know that I'm really, really close and it's the most exciting thing ever. As soon as I get the word from my agency that I can go - there's nothing holding me back. Definitely not finances!!!! God is so good. And He truly does provide. Thank you Jesus!

On top of realizing that I'm pretty much ready to go financially speaking, my friends are throwing me a baby shower tomorrow. I've thrown a whole bunch of baby and wedding showers over the years but I can't even describe how excited I am that I get to have one and that ultimately the fact that we're having a shower means one very important thing: this is finally, really happening! My boy is coming home soon!!! Praise the Lord. There will be much joy and celebration tomorrow, that is for sure.?

I feel so blessed, especially this week? - I've been so amazed at the outpouring of support from family, friends and strangers around the world who were commenting on my photos, spreading the word on their facebook pages and encouraging others to donate to help get my sweet boy home. So many have donated. So many have sent me notes of encouragement. So many have been praying.

The Visiting Orphans staff took me to lunch and a movie Friday to celebrate me passing court. And they gave me the book "You are Special" and what they wrote inside is so very special. They wrote the sweetest message to Mihretu. I couldn't read it without crying. It blessed me so much. I cannot wait for him to get here and meet all these amazing people in my life.


So many already love this little boy that I love so very much. I'm seeing the body of Christ in action and I'm seeing the Lord provide in so many neat ways. It's everything you can think of - from several of my friends helping to take care of my dog for free for 2 weeks (that saved me like $600) to some serious blessings in Ethiopia of several nights free lodging to the miraculousness of getting to meet with the judge and do my parental interview while I was already in Ethiopia therefore saving me at least several thousand dollars by avoiding having to book another flight over there. The list goes on. And then there's all of the people I don't even know who have read my blog, saw others posting about my adoption and felt led to give - that blows me away. And on top of all that - there is my amazing group of friends and family who have been celebrating with me and just encouraging me so much throughout this whole process. The prayers alone that have gone up on behalf of this adoption and this child? - more than I can count. Mihretu doesn't even know yet how truly loved he is and how many people have played a part in this adoption and ultimately in his future. Amazing!!! Plus y'all have literally prayed me through - during many months of no movement at all, during discouragement and impatience and wondering if things would ever move. I see God using all of you in this. You are all part of this story. And I'm so glad I have a tree hanging over Mihretu's bed that will display every one of your names. From the bottom of my heart - thank you. I wish you knew just how much you've blessed me and strengthened me during all of this. Words cannot even quite express how I feel. I'm overwhelmed with the goodness and the love that has been poured out. My joy is overflowing.

Source: http://mysingleadoption.blogspot.com/2012/08/too-excited-to-sleep.html

arkansas razorbacks trisomy 18 ozzie guillen ozzie guillen buster posey eric holder eric holder

campusparty: Yossi Vardi @ #CPeurope. Vardi is one of Israel's pioneering tech entrepreneurs. In a career spannin http://t.co/5zYCWFG4

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://twitter.com/campusparty/statuses/238675923447193601

big ten acc challenge 2011 john wayne gacy amr jack del rio fired jack del rio fired made in america made in america

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Legal and Evidentiary Aspects of Forensic Computing | Law Teacher

1 ? Introduction

This report will review an article from the ?Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 34.2? (Summer 2008). The article being reviewed is ?Combatting Sexual Predators online and the conflicts with free speech: an analysis of legislative approaches in New Jersey?. It can be found on pages 366 through to 395 and was written by Terel Klein.

This report will identify and discuss the main themes and sub themes in the article to determine if the author has produced accurate evidence to support his conclusion. The way in which the information was gathered to formulate the conclusion and its relevance to the articles title will be analysed to see if the themes within the article are reflected by the title. The article will also be reviewed to see how credible it is and the author?s credibility will be reviewed to see if the author has the experience and expertise to write an article on the subject.

2 - Article Summary & Review

2.1 ? Article Section 1 - Introduction

The article ?Combating Sexual Predators online and the conflicts with free speech: an analysis of legislative approaches in New Jersey? main purpose is to discuss two bills which were introduced in New Jersey and ?related to the posting of false or defamatory information on the internet? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008). The first bill (New Jersey Assembly Bill No. 1327, 2006) was introduced by ?Assemblymen Peter Biondi, during the 2006-2007 session of the New Jersey Assembly?, (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008) and this bill was designed to ?make certain operators of interactive computer services and Internet service providers liable to persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites? (Assembly Bill No.1327 212th Legislature, 2006). The second bill (New Jersey Senate Bill No. 580, 2008) was introduced by ?Senator Kevin O?Toole, during the 2008-2009 session of the New Jersey Senate? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008) and this bill ?Prohibits posting of certain personal information on the Internet or misrepresentation of identity on the internet for the purpose of harassment of a minor child? (Senate Bill No. 580 213th Legislature, 2008).

The author states in the article that both bills are aimed to not curb the freedom of speech but to help stop the dangers posed by unsupervised minors from being harassed or groomed by strangers online. He uses two cases which are believed to be the cases which promoted the legislators to produce the new bills. The first case involved a 12-year-old who had their personal details taken and a profile on the social networking site MySpace.com was created. The profile resulted in the 12-year-old receiving a large volume of unwanted phone calls. The MySpace profile contained such information as the person?s name, mobile number, photograph of a ?provocatively dressed woman? and represented the 12-year-old to appear as a stripper. The second case involved a 14-year-old girl. In this case the author speaks about how the girl was strangled to death and found in a dumpster, and it was believed this occurred after meeting with an older man she had met through MySpace.

Already from reading this it gives the first impression that myspace.com or social networks as a whole play a large role in the reasons behind these bills, or at least in the author?s opinion. The author also believes that it is strange that Senator O?Toole chooses a bill that prevents posting of false information and makes it a criminal offence, rather than to take action on what people do with the information, such as the phone calls in the 12-year-old?s case (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008).

2.2 ? Article Section 2 - A Brief History of Criminal Libel

2.2.1 ? Criminal Libel in the United States

The two bills which are being examined by the author are both Criminal Libel and so this leads him to start by discussing ?A Brief History of Criminal Libel?. This section is broken down into two sections. The first section is ?Criminal Libel in the United States?. During this section he looks at when an incident occurs that may be criminal, journalists look back and comment on out of date laws. He looks back on already existing laws geared towards preventing similar behaviour and how technology may affect them, and if the new bills are required. He states that some journalists protest in a large manor compared to others and argue that there should be no action taken against those who post the information. With this in mind he looks at the opinions of scholars and journalists such as Gregory C. Lisby and his critique on ?Criminal libel?. The author focus?s a large chunk of this section on a criminal libel case Jim Garrison V. The State Of Louisiana. This case was based on a Mr Garrison making defamatory statements against the judges of the Criminal District Court of the Orleans Parish (379 U.S. 64 - Garrison v. State of Louisiana). The author summarises the case and states that only deliberate action to discredit or harm someone can be punished, and in this case, Mr Garrison was voicing his opinion which would fall under freedom of speech. By punishing Mr Garrison, this would have therefore become unconstitutional as it breaks the first amendment which is freedom of speech, so the case was dropped; however, the court did not rule this case out to be unconstitutional. If they had stated that the case was unconstitutional, it would have meant any other case punished for the same offence may become re-opened. The author continues to discuss how old laws are not consistent with new technology, so those committing criminal offences are getting away with it and there are fewer convictions. He goes on to say that although it appears that there are a growing number of people agreeing on how criminal libel is behind in times, he emphasises that if something is said by someone it is believed to be true because it is said by someone who is credible or knows what they are talking about or if they have a large reputation. The author also emphasises in this section that Gregory C. Lisby critique on ?Criminal libel? is worded harshly (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008), but captures how thought of deeper meaning of law has grown and more people think about it and are made aware. It shows that he wants to try and give the impression that it is not just him that has a strong view against criminal libel statutes.

Finally in this section the author discusses how two bills draw upon a sentiment, and he believes that the target prospective legislation gives the mental attitude that if something is believable it should be accepted as being true. Because it is difficult to develop an idea that people will make the decision to post information on the internet that may bring out or provoke sexual advances or communication from someone that is not wanted, towards na?ve and/or unsupervised individuals, be them children or not.

The author believes that Senator O?Toole?s bill means the type of speech contemplated only has the ability to disturb ?order and morality?. This moves the author onto voicing his opinion that Senator O?Toole wants to make what someone says a criminal act, but that would then be breaking the First Amendment and thereby preventing freedom of speech, which is unconstitutional. This would imply that the author has a strong view against Senator O?Toole?s bill. And it could be said this early on in the paper, that the author already has a strong view against criminal libel and would prefer civil libel.

2.2.1 ? The Resurgence of Criminal Libel

9This section of the article the author discusses the increase in interest and activity in criminal libel. He begins by talking about how there is no conclusive evidence on the total number of criminal libel cases, including cases related to the internet. He uses another article by an Edward L .Carter who discusses the boundaries of free speech on the internet. It is noticeable from looking at both this article, and the article written by Edward L. Carter that they both share a very similar article layout and review of the history on criminal libel to voice their opinions. The author of this article uses a wide variety of reference from Carters article, including how uses reference 30 of his article which refers to Edward L. Carter?s article. here, the author voices his opinion using this reference to support it by pointing out that media coverage is suggesting that internet-related criminal libel cases are increasingly becoming common (CARTER, Edward L., 2004-2005). He also voices his opinion that the internet seems to be a ?fertile breeding ground for criminal libel cases? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008) because of the ability to become anonymous so that anyone can say anything and no-one knows who is saying it. It is clear to say the author believes that the internet makes it easier for people to produce threatening behaviour and have it viewed and received by a much larger audience in a much quicker time frame. Again the author uses Edward L. Carter?s article to support his opinion. He does not appear to use alternative sources which may imply that he is making his judgement based on this article only.

To support the first paragraph of this section and what has been summarized and reviewed above the author refers back to six past cases. He also uses these cases to support his statement on the internet?s role in criminal libel cases and how it provided an indication as to the type of harm that can be caused by the posting of false information about individuals on the internet. Each case that the author discusses is shown to have a form of defamatory abuse via the internet and of posting of information. He uses these cases to again voice his opinion that if something is said on the internet it is blown out of proportion due to the larger audience that it is seen by. A prime example of this would be the case in 1999, where a woman commented online that a police officer had engaged in an act behind a restaurant and she was charged with criminal defamation. The author says ?Again, the comment at issue was one that would likely have been forgotten if made in passing, but thanks to the internet, it was immortalized and drew wide attention? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008).

All of the cases that are discussed in this section all relate to the topic in hand, however, it is noticeable that this article was written in 2008, but all of the cases other than one, are all dated 1998-2000. Earlier in the article, he discussed how technology is forever developing and new laws need to be put in place to keep up, but all of the cases seem to be rather out of date and out of context, as the two bills being discussed are targeting what is done and said online at the time of them being written. Why does the author only discuss one case during the time of 2006? And why is it that this case seems to be far more extreme than the others? The case in 2006 shows that a man is sentenced to twenty-three years in prison for twenty-six felony counts which include criminal libel. The felonies do not appear to even relate to this articles title and extremeness of this case does not appear to relate to speech on the internet, only the part where the man creates a website in a professor?s name.

There is also a pattern occurring throughout the report. Looking back at the introduction to the report where the author mentions that the 2 cases involving a 12-year-old and a 14-year-old encouraged Biondi and O?Toole to introduce their bills, both cases related to MySpace.com. Again, in this section of the report, the author mentions MySpace.com as one of his case examples. During the time of these cases however, there are also other social networks such as Facebook.com and Bebo.com, yet no cases he mentions relate to these social networking sites. It appears as though he has a bias opinion towards either myspace.com or social networks as a whole, and uses myspace.com as an example to voice that view.

Using these cases he comes to the conclusion that people deserve some form of protection. So he does believe it is a good idea to implement some form of law. However as said before, it appears as though he has a strong opinion against a criminal libel bill, and would much prefer cases such as these to be dealt with through civil libel. He also believes some of this behaviour which isn?t so serious to just become ignored rather than ?dragged into a courtroom?. He continues to discuss social networks, which again supports the suggestion that he has some form of bias opinion and he believes that some form of resolution is needed to reduce the possible dangers.

2.3 ? Article Section 3 - Analysing the New Jersey Bills

This section of the article takes a deeper look at the two bills in question but before doing so, the author takes a look into criminal libel statutes from other states. He uses this to form an opinion on how the bills in question may fair out and how they may make an impact on the issues they are attempting to address.

2.3.1 ? Recent Challenges to Criminal Libel Statutes

The author makes a point that at the time of writing the paper, there are only twenty states that still have some variety of criminal libel statutes in affect. However, this article was written in summer 2008. The source of which the author got this information from was in August 2006, which makes his statement that ?currently, twenty states still have some variety of criminal libel statute(s) in effect? false. After researching further online, an article dated April 2007 states ?Sixteen states have a criminal libel statute? (JARED TAYLOR, 2007) which is dated one year prior to this article being written.

This section takes two of the states, Utah and Colorado and looks at cases which have been challenged in court in these states. The first case is based in Utah and is dated back to 2000. Again, this seems to become a little strange that the author mentions at the start of this passage that he will focus on two states that have shown the most recent activity, but he then picks a case which is dated eight years before the time he is writing this paper. This case also shows how the criminal libel statute that was in place was ?struck down by the Supreme Court of Utah? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008). However he doesn?t seem to mention that the statute that was used in this case, was struck down in 2002, two years after the Ian Lake case began (STUDENT PRESS LAW CENTER, 2002) and in 2007 a new bill (S.B 86) was introduced which repealed libel and slander provisions (UTAH STATE LEGISLATURE, 2007). This means the sections of the bills that made it unconstitutional was removed. It was believed that original statute was overboard, and he then refers back to the Garrison V Louisiana case which also had a very similar outcome. The author however makes a massive point again, just like he did with previous cases, that criminal charges were still brought, because what was said was said via the internet opening up to the eyes of a wider audience, and if it had been something said while in school, it would have been ignored.

Again the author uses the Utah case as another way to voice his opinion on criminal libel statutes. It is very clear by this point in the article that the author already has a bias opinion towards criminal libel. He only appears to drag out cases where the case is found to be unconstitutional.

The second case in the state of Colorado was in 2004, and was in regards to a man who posted ?an altered photograph? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008), which contained defamatory text about a professor. The man?s computer was seized by the police. But the case ended very quickly, after the man took action and had the ?American Civil Liberties Union? sue the Colorado Attorney. However, police did not ever charge the man with criminal libel statute and so the man?s challenge against the District court was dismissed because he was unable to challenge it when he had not been charged.

The authors finalises this section by mentioning that although the Utah bill was struck down, it does not mean in any way that the bills that this article are about will end up with the same fate. He believes that the new bills for New Jersey would have considered all of what has happened in states such as Utah and any small problem that may form them the become unconstitutional, as this is an issue that requires very careful work to ensure a bill is produced that meets all requirements possible without breaking the freedom of speech. He also questions whether a criminal libel law that is constitutional is even possible to meet the requirements they are trying to get it to meet. He uses this to refer back to 14-year-old girl case he mentioned in the introduction, which encourages the idea of these bills. He questions that would the man tempting the young girl to meet have been punished under the already existing New Jersey statute if contained an actual malice requirement, which gives the impression that the author thinks maybe current statutes should be considered to be amended? Rather than new bills implemented. His view seems to imply that in cases where someone who wasn?t convicted on the old statutes, could have been convicted if they were amended. He makes the point about O?Toole?s bill that if this is the case, is there any point in passing O?Toole?s bill.

The author only appears to have a section on ?Recent Challenges to Criminal Libel Statutes?, which gives the impression he is only looking for the bad points on criminal libel. Neither case he speaks about in this section is on cases that were challenged but then the challenges were overcalled. This appears to give the impression that the author wants to make it seem as though criminal libel statutes are a bad thing.

2.3.2 ? The Development of New Jersey Libel Law in the Internet Age

This section, the author talks about how at the time of the Garrison V. Louisiana case, New Jersey did not have any form of criminal libel statutes in place which dealt with the posting of defamatory information on the internet. The only form of criminal libel statute that was in place that had any form of relation to this was one that prevented ?broadcasting or televising defamatory statements or representation? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008). There was only one other statute and it was declared unconstitutional. This brings the author to discuss how the courts of New Jersey have instead used the method of using common law, also known as case law, where the decisions of previous cases spur the decision to the case in hand. The issue with common law is with technology continuing to develop, there are more things that are said and different ways of being able to do it via the internet, so there are previous cases that may not relate in any way to a new case. He believes that it is because of the little development in law in New Jersey which has spurred the need for action to be taken, thus the 2 bills being introduced.

It is not until this passage of the whole article, where we begin to see the author bring up the subject on internet service providers and action being taken against the. This is what Assemblymen Peter Biondi?s bill is attempting to do. Here the author discusses how it is far easier in the real world to identify someone and sue them, or charge them with an offence. He uses a newspaper as an example, saying that if an article is made which has defamatory statements, it is easy to identify the author. But with the internet and message boards in particular, it is difficult to identify an anonymous poster without a larger investigation, which results in the message board owners them self to become under attack and possibly charged. He argues this point by using a case from New Jersey, Donato V. Moldow. In this case he shows how someone tried to accuse a website operator as being liable for content that someone else had posted on their website. However, this accusation backfired in court and the website operator was made immune from liability. This is because it fell under the Communications Decency Act. The author has not yet stated but the bill that Assemblymen Peter Biondi is trying to introduce was withdrawn. An alternative source has been acquired which shows an open letter urging withdrawal of the bill. In the letter it states ?we believe that free speech is a fundamental human right and that the right to speak anonymously is vital to our society? (ELECTRONIC FORNTIER FOUNDATION, 2006). If Assemblymen Peter Biondi?s bill had taken affect, it is clear that it would have curbed the right to free speech on the internet resulting in it becoming unconstitutional.

He furthers this subject on to discuss a case were a court stated that there should be a four prong test. these are that the person making accusations should first notify the anonymous poster and give them reasonable amount of time to file an opposition, the person making accusations must identify and show proof of the posts that the anonymous poster made, the person making accusations must provide enough evidence to form a strong case and finally determine if it is freedom of speech, or if it is too far and breaking the law of the current bills in place. The problem with the four prongs test is there is no scale to measure who has more right, the person making the accusations, or the person making the posts. The author comments on how the court tries to emphasis the third prong, that the person making the accusation about someone posting defamatory content must show and gather enough evidence to produce a strong case. He also makes a big point that despite the all of this, it still proves hard to get access and information to catch them via the internet.

2.3.3 ? Alternative Approaches to Protecting Children from Internet Speech

During this section of the article, the author is looking at alternatives to protecting children on the internet, he uses the case mentioned in the previous section to put his point across about civil libel, and says that criminal is pointless because it servers the same purpose as the civil remedy. But for the first time in this article, he also says the opposite appears to be true because civil may fail to provide a form of compensation and ?This is perhaps the best justification for the adoption of a criminal libel statute.? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008). Even after making the statement that a criminal libel statute may be the best option, he then continues to say viable alternatives must be found and considered, which again to a previous observation made, shows he already has a formed opinion against criminal libel and appears to keep trying to find alternatives, or ague against it.

He begins by looking at the Communication Decency Act. As mentioned earlier in this report. He says that the he CDA constraints the civil liability of ISPs. The Communications Decency Act states "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." (ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION). Unfortunately the CDA was also struck down by the Supreme Court and said to be an unconstitutional violation of the first amendment, and broke freedom of speech. He goes on to say, because of this, it resulted in the CDA no longer being able to protect young minors from online predators. What appears to me unclear is why the title of this article is referring to ?Sexual Predators? because not all defamatory statements made on message boards, or these two bills are sexual, some are just general harassment, or abuse. The author says that although the CDA allows room for criminal and state laws to potentially work side by side, if a law existed that protected children and did not reduce the immunity granted to ISP?s like the CDA, and did not violate the First Amendment right to posters online, then that would be the ideal method to protect children.

So the author believes that even with the CDA being an alternative to the bills, it is still not enough and there can still be something else out there.

The next alternative he moves onto to discuss is the Child Online Protection Act (COPA). This act was intended to prevent minors from viewing material online that they may find to be harmful. Unfortunately this Act was again one that was found to be ?unconstitutional for infringing on First Amendment rights.? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008).

Due to both of these alternatives being unconstitutional he believes that to produce the best alternative it is better to look at already existing laws that can be used to produce new laws, using them as a template to work from. In this he refers to 18 U.S.C [Section] 2422 which has a basic template of a law that basically says someone can be charged for attempting to entice, coerce, persuade or induce an individual under the age of 18 and they can be punished for getting them to do something they should not be participating in. an example it uses is prostitution. Unfortunately they do not address legislation through criminal libel. But this is yet again, another hint that the author is trying to push his opinion of having an alternative that is not criminal libel, and possible use civil libel instead.

The author has identified that although this template did not directly address all of the issues that Senator O?Toole is trying to address, there was a case involving a man who performed a sexually implicit chat with a young girl and arranging to meet was successfully charged under this statute, and the man was arrested by police. The statute was also found to meet the first amendment and was not found to be ?unconstitutionally overboard or vague?. (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008). However what the author does not make a point, this statute is in regards to ?coercion and Enticement?. The police also coerced him by pretending to be a young girl, so does this not contradict the issue? Why can they get away with it, and not him? If they were not pretending to be a young girl, would he have tried to go after another? Or would it of never happened. If the police had not claimed to have been a 13 year old girl, the crime may not have even happened in the first place. The author also uses a second case which involved similar offences, and attempted to meet with an underage person to engage in sexual activity. The statute here was also up held and was not seen to be unconstitutional, even when the defendant attempted to appeal against.

Finally he ends this section of the report by discussing that 2422(b) can be identified as different from that of the statute in the garrison case which was struck down by the Supreme Court. The author emphasises that this is because the aim is to protect minors from involvement in sexual activity but unless the use of mailing connected to this activity, it is not punishable under the 2422(b) statute. Which means this is yet another statute that remains with a wide section left open allowing minors to fall victim to sexual predators online.

To conclude this section, it is clear that the author cannot seem to accept a criminal libel statute. Instead he seems to try and find as many alternatives as possible, and when there is no suitable alternative that can be used, he then begins to move back onto his opinion on civil libel statutes.

the last alternative, 2422(b) was the closet possible match there was which did not curb the freedom of speech, however it did not appear give maximum protection to minors.

2.4 ? Article Section 4 ? Conclusion

2.4.1 ? The Legal Sufficiency and Practical Efficacy of the New Jersey Bills

The author starts this section by discussing how social networks play a large role in the reasons behind Assemblymen Peter Biondi and Senator O?Toole?s bills. He mentions how the sites ?invite underage users to post information about themselves? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008). He explains that websites such as myspace.com are working with the government officials to make it easier for minors to report sexual predators or suspicious activity. As the author begins to elaborate more on social networks and actions that the government officials take, he begins to agree that the bills that are being introduced have a purpose, however he disagrees on the methods and ways in which they are being introduced and also questions if they are even legally viable options.

He believes that if a challenge was made towards Assemblymen Peter Biondi?s bill, then it is highly unlikely that it would withstand, because if the ISP company was not able to provide such information as who the anonymous poster is or any information, there is no sufficient evidence to stand up in court, resulting in no ability to take action towards the person performing the defamatory actions. And as mentioned earlier in the report, ISP?s in the CDA have an immunity, which would mean this bill would conflict with the CDA?s ?spirit and policy? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008). This is where the author begins to become quite harsh with his wording and states that the New Jersey Bill 1327 is an offence to the policy of the federal government, which is taken to be his own personal opinion and he does not reference any sources to indicate that there is any supporting evidence that this is true. Due to these findings it allows the author to finish with his final opinion on the legal sufficiency of the New Jersey Bill 1327 by saying that it is unlikely that the if there was a challenge in court that the statute win.

He appears to become very brief with Senator O?Toole?s bill in regards to the CDA as there does not seem to be any conflicts with already existing laws. Senate Bill 580 differs from the already existing laws such as 18 U.S.C. [section] 2422(b). As mentioned previously Senator O?Toole?s bill is targeting the ?posting of certain personal information on the internet and misrepresentation of identity on the internet for the purpose of harassment of a minor child? (Senate Bill No. 580 213th Legislature, 2008) is written in a way that resembles a criminal libel statute unlike 2422 which resembles a civil libel statute.

The author believes strongly that if the Senate Bill 580 was challenged in court it would withstand the challenge and would not be seen as unconstitutional, which would indicate that this bill would fall within the realms of acceptable, as it not only meets the needs to help protect minors online, it is also within the boundaries of freedom of speech. But he does point out that it ignores whether the information is true or not, which was discussed back at the beginning of the article. even if the information posted is true about the minor which has been posted, the defended could still be punished.

After reviewing both bills and their legal sufficiency the author still questions if either bills meets the requirements to fix the issue of minors becoming victims to sexual predators online. He believes that even though Senate Bill 580 address the issue in hand better out of the two bills, it still does not address the main concerns of which he believes is infact the problem. he feels that the bill does not address a much wider and bigger problem which is the targets themselves who post information about themselves online. As he has mentioned before when talking about social networks, he mentions that the targets themselves have the ability to share and post personal information, and although the government are trying to work hand in hand with the social networking companies to help report suspicious activity, they are not doing enough to prevent the target themselves from provoking or encouraging sexual predators to contact them without even knowing. He also believes that if the target or a friend of the target post false information about themselves, this also can provoke a sexual predator into becoming interested, and he feels that its activities such as this that also need to become addressed.

A prime example the author uses of information being published by someone else, and then someone seeing this information and making contact is the case right back at the start of the article with the 12-year-old boy. The author tries to make a point that the person who is trying to make communication should be the object of criminal law. This is shown in the statement he makes about the case at the beginning of the article, ?After all, while the classmate or prankster may be deserving of punishment, the real object of the criminal libel law is the person trying to create an opportunity to engage in illegal sexual conduct with a child in the position of hickey? (KLEIN, Terel, Summer 2008). When he says classmate or prankster, this can be seen as the person who took the 12-year-old?s (hickey) personal information and posted it online.

The author finally comes to conclude that he believes O?Toole?s bills is also stupid because even if information is not there, the predator is still going to be looking, and that it is stupid to punish someone posting information, be if the person or a someone who knows the person. Because he believes it should be the predator themselves who should be punished. He makes a strong point that although O?Toole?s bill may reduce the amount of opportunities for predators to find prey on the internet, it does not resolve nor prevent, nor punish the predator for making direct contact when they do find a vulnerable person or minor. The author again voices the opinion on ?private action? which would be commonly known as a civil libel case, when discussing how most information comes from the children themselves and not those looking to harm them.

2.4.2 ? Corollaries to the national Situation

Overall Review of Article

Now that the article has been summarized an understanding of the article and the author has been developed, this will be used to produce a review. Before progressing with the article review, it is important to know who the author is to understand what he has spoken about in his article is written from a knowledgeable background and to identify if both the author and the article are credible.

The author is?.

The main theme of this article is that the author considers criminal libel to be damaging to freedom of speech.

The author appears to voice his opinions and produce an article very similar to ?Outlaw speech on the Internet: examining the link between unique characteristics of online media and criminal libel prosecutions.?


How do you rate the quality of the essay above?

Thanks for letting us know!

Request the removal of this law essay

Source: http://www.lawteacher.net/technology-law/essays/legal-and-evidentiary-aspects-of-forensic-computing-law-essays.php

joseph gordon levitt katy perry russell brand mark hurd new ipad 3 jodie fisher zooey deschanel yvette prieto

Monday, August 20, 2012

Japan foreign ministry says reporter killed in Syria

Japan's foreign ministry confirmed Tuesday that a woman reporter had been killed in Syria as she was reporting on the conflict-wracked country.

The ministry confirmed the reporter was Mika Yamamoto, 45, said an official in charge of Japanese nationals' safety abroad.

"She was at reporting work in Aleppo, northern Syria, when she was caught in gunfire," the official said.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights had earlier reported that an unnamed Japanese female journalist had died in Aleppo, the scene of heavy fighting in recent days and weeks, and three other reporters were missing.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/japanese-reporter-killed-syrias-aleppo-3-missing-ngo-205940574.html

ufc results water for elephants old school nick swisher jaco san jose sharks humber perfect game

Pussy Riot forgiven by Russian Orthodox Church

THE Church's absolution may be little comfort for the band, who face two years in jail.

RELIGIOUS leaders in Russia say they have forgiven feminist rockers Pussy Riot for performing a punk prayer in a cathedral.

The three members of the band ? Maria Alyokhina, 24, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, and Yekaterina Samutsevich, 29 ?were jailed for two years on Friday after being convicted of ?hooliganism motivated by religious hatred?.

They were found guilty of protesting in a Russian Orthodox Church ? the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow ? against the church leader?s support of president Vladimir Putin.

Tikhon Shevkunov, who heads Moscow?s Sretensky Monastery, said: ?The church has been sometimes accused of not forgiving. We did forgive them from the very start but such actions should be cut short by society and authorities.?

Archpriest Maxim Kozlov agreed but added that he hopes the women, and their supporters, will change their ways.

He said: ?We are praying and hoping these young women and all the people shouting in front of the court building ? committing sacrilegious acts not only in Russia but in other countries ? realise their acts are awful.

?Despite this, the church is asking for mercy within the limits of law.?

However, both clerics supported the court?s decision to prosecute the band.

Source: http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/pussy-riot-forgiven-1268977

lesnar vs overeem appetizer recipes alistair overeem alistair overeem texas a m insight bowl russell brand files for divorce

Saturday, August 18, 2012

CCIIO Finalizes Blueprint for Health Insurance Exchanges

?

The Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO) released on August 14 its final ?Blueprint for Approval of Affordable State-based and State Partnership Exchanges? under Title I of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).??? The ?blueprint? requires applications from States electing to fully operate Exchanges as well as States electing to perform selected exchange functions in partnership with a ?Federally-facilitated Exchange (FFE).?? ?

One FFE partnership option under the ?blueprint? enables States to take the lead role in health plan management activities such as certification, recertification, and decertification of qualified health plans (QHPs); collection and analysis of data on QHPs; and QHP monitoring and oversight.?? Another FFE partnership option enables States to take the lead role in consumer assistance activities such as overseeing in-person consumer assistance, managing the Navigator program (under which direct assistance will be provided to help consumers sign up for health coverage), and other public outreach and education activities.? States can elect either or both options.

The final ?blueprint? differs from an earlier draft issued on May 16 in that it provides for a new in-person assistance option, distinct from Navigators, which will be useful especially in the Exchanges? initial open enrollment period.?? Exchanges will begin taking applications from consumers on October 1, 2013 for coverage available on January 1, 2014.? The new option will be eligible for funding under Exchange Establishment grants.

The final ?blueprint? requires States to submit applications, declarations of intent from the Governor, and legal certifications to CCIIO by November 16, 2012 to secure conditional approval in January 2013 for Exchange functions related to coverage available in January 2014. ?States that do not elect to participate in 2014 may elect to participate in 2015.? States may also elect in any case to make Medicaid eligibility determinations under the ACA, collaborate with FFEs in activities such as data exchanges and reviews of QHPs, and operate their own reinsurance programs under the ACA.

?

?

Source: http://www.publicconsultinggroup.com/HHSNews/post/CCIIO-Finalizes-Blueprint-for-Health-Insurance-Exchanges.aspx

cadillac ats bain capital marines urinating haley barbour olivier martinez peoples choice awards 2012 ford recalls